Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20VvsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.9 T6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,537kg3,389lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,922cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | 1,126L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 272g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 5,200 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 5,200 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V has 22 hp more than Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 7.1 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V has more power, Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 272 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Is 78 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























