Car comparison

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6vsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S80

2.8 24V T6

272 hp2783 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan1998-2001
VS

Nissan Cedric (Y33)

3.0T V6

270 hp2987 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1995-1997

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.4 L/100 km
    19.0 mpg US
    22.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    645 km
    401 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    172 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS802.8 24V T6NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
272hp203kW
270hp201kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
368Nm271lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
2,210kg4,872lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
645km401mi
Calculated
620km385mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,783cc170cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,822mm190in
-
Width
1,832mm72in
-
Height
1,434mm56in
-
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
-
Front track
1,562mm61in
-
Rear track
1,560mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
145mm6in
Trunk volume
440L
-
Max trunk volume
1,106L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS802.8 24V T65,400 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,650 rpm
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V66,000 rpm3,600 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS802.8 24V T6NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
25.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
272 hp
203 kW
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 has 2 hp more than Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T67.2 s
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V67.0 s

Although Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 has more power, Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
645 km
401 mi
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
620 km
385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
272 hp
203 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW
7.0 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
7.2 s
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS802.8 24V T6NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
270 hp
201 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Range score
645 km
401 mi
620 km
385 mi
Trunk score
440 L
15.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S80 2.8 24V T6Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 12 Nm more
  • Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.8 24V T6
2.9 T6 24V
VS
VolvoS802.8 24V T6vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
3.0T V6
2.5T
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsNissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
2.8 24V T6
2.3 T5
VS
VolvoS802.8 24V T6vsVolvoS702.3 T5
3.0T V6
5.7 215i
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsHSVCaprice5.7 215i
2.8 24V T6
2.3 T5 20V
VS
VolvoS802.8 24V T6vsVolvoS602.3 T5 20V
3.0T V6
2.0 SSS-Z
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsNissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z
2.8 24V T6
740i
VS
VolvoS802.8 24V T6vsBMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i
3.0T V6
740i
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsBMW7 Series (E38)740i
2.8 24V T6
540i V8
VS
VolvoS802.8 24V T6vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
3.0T V6
4.2 V8 32V
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsAUDIA8 (D2/4D)4.2 V8 32V
2.8 24V T6
2.7 BiTurbo V6
VS
VolvoS802.8 24V T6vsAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0T V6
185i V8
VS
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6vsHSVClubsport (VR/VS)185i V8
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 vs Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster