Nissan Teana
Car comparison
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6vsNissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Bluebird (U14)
2.0 SSS-Z
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score78/100
Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 196Nm145lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.0s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 648km403mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,845mm191in | 4,565mm180in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,695mm67in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,395mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,465mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,455mm57in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 476L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 7,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.0 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 190 hp 142 kW |
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has 55 hp more than Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 7.9 s |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 7.8 s |
Although Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has more power, Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 and Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | NissanBluebird (U14)2.0 SSS-Z | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 648 km 403 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 | Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 134 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Nissan Bluebird (U14) 2.0 SSS-Z
- Is 339 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























