Polestar 4
102 kWh
544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-present
Car comparison
Polestar 4 102 kWhvsNIO EC6 II 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
NIO EC6 II
100 kWh
490 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-2025
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score0/100
NIO EC6 II 100 kWh
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,340 kg5,159 lb
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar4102 kWh | NIOEC6 II100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544hp406kW | 490hp365kW |
| Torque | 686Nm506lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,351kg5,183lb | 2,340kg5,159lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,826kg6,230lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 47.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,839mm191in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 2,139mm84in | 1,995mm79in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,999mm118in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,711mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,711mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 166mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,536L | 1,402L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar4102 kWh | NIOEC6 II100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW |
Polestar 4 102 kWh has 54 hp more than NIO EC6 II 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between NIO EC6 II 100 kWh and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | 2,340 kg 5,159 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 3.8 s |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 4 102 kWh and NIO EC6 II 100 kWh: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOEC6 II100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar4102 kWh | NIOEC6 II100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp 406 kW | 490 hp 365 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb | 2,340 kg 5,159 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Has 54 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
NIO EC6 II 100 kWh
- Has 14 Nm more
- Is 11 kg lighter
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 4 102 kWh
NIO EC6 II 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
NIOEC6 II100 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Polestar4102 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
NIOEC6 II100 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
NIOEC6 II100 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
Polestar4102 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 V8
NIOEC6 II100 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
Polestar4102 kWhvsLotusEletreX H550 2.0L
NIOEC6 II100 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
NIOEC6 II100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53