Porsche 968
Car comparison
Porsche 968 3.0 8V Turbo SvsMitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi 3000 GT
3.0 i 24V 4x4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 968 3.0 8V Turbo S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful305 hp227 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score0/100
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305hp227kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 385Nm/t257lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,990cc182cu in | 2,972cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,320mm170in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,275mm50in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,450mm57in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 510L | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 968 3.0 8V Turbo S: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 5,400 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 305 hp 227 kW |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW |
Porsche 968 3.0 8V Turbo S has 19 hp more than Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Porsche 968 3.0 8V Turbo S: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 5.0 s |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | 305 hp 227 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche9683.0 8V Turbo S | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp 227 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 968 3.0 8V Turbo S
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 93 Nm more
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 71 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























