Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7vsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range810 km503 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 33.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,374mm172in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | - | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 33.9 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 has 81 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 81 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 5.7 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)2.7 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7 | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) 2.7
- Has 81 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























