Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSIvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedHatchback2013-2017
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

Cooper S 1.6

190 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,305 kg
    2,877 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    139 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    783 km
    487 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,353kg2,983lb
1,305kg2,877lb
Gross weight
1,938kg4,273lb
1,775kg3,913lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
82.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
32.6s
Calculated
38.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
746km464mi
Calculated
783km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,659mm183in
4,114mm162in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,461mm58in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,531mm60in
Rear track
1,512mm60in
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
590L
330L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
1,080L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
50L
47L
CO2 emissions
154g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSIMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.65,500-6,500 rpm1,700-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.6 s
38.0 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
1,353 kg
2,983 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1,305 kg
2,877 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI7.4 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.67.4 s

Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
746 km
464 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
783 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.4 s
229 km/h
142 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.4 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,353 kg
2,983 lb
1,305 kg
2,877 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
746 km
464 mi
783 km
487 mi
CO2 score
154 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III 1.8 TSIMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 260 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 48 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 15 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
1.8 TSI
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
1.8 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1.8 TSI
B 220
VS
SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W246)Facelift 2014B 220
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI vs Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster