Mini Hatch (R56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6vsMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
JCW 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,130 kg2,491 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range704 km438 mi
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score88/100
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,130kg2,491lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.4s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 79.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.4s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 704km438mi Calculated | 635km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,714mm146in | 4,124mm162in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,407mm55in | 1,527mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,467mm97in | 2,596mm102in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 107mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 172g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.4 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 has 7 hp more than Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 6.5 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 6.9 s |
Although Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 has more power, Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 704 km 438 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 635 km 395 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 704 km 438 mi | 635 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 172 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 | Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























