Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F55)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

JCW 1.6

218 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,240 kg
    2,734 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    128 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    800 km
    497 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
192hp143kW
218hp163kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,240kg2,734lb
1,400kg3,086lb
Gross weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
71.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
79.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
28.4s
Calculated
32.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
800km497mi
Calculated
635km395mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,005mm158in
4,124mm162in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,527mm60in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,596mm102in
Front track
1,501mm59in
1,527mm60in
Rear track
1,501mm59in
1,554mm61in
Ground clearance
146mm6in
107mm4in
Trunk volume
278L
330L
Max trunk volume
941L
1,080L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
44L
47L
CO2 emissions
128g/km
172g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6PowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.04,700-6,000 rpm1,250-4,750 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.66,000 rpm2,100-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.4 s
32.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
218 hp
163 kW

Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 has 26 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
1,400 kg
3,086 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06.8 s
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.66.9 s

Although Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 has more power, Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
800 km
497 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
635 km
395 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
6.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
218 hp
163 kW
6.9 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,124 mm
162.4 in
Height
1,527 mm
60.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.8 s
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
192 hp
143 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,124 mm
162.4 in
Height
1,527 mm
60.1 in
Range score
800 km
497 mi
635 km
395 mi
CO2 score
128 g/km
172 g/km
Trunk score
278 L
9.8 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0

  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 44 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 52 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
JCW 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
JCW 1.6
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
JCW 1.6
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
JCW 1.6
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)GTI 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F66)Cooper S 2.0
JCW 1.6
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTI 2.0 TSI
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 vs Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster