Mini Hatch (R56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6vsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range783 km487 mi
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,155 kg2,546 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,155kg2,546lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.9s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 783km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,714mm146in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,407mm55in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,467mm97in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.9 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 6 hp more than Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,155 kg 2,546 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.4 s |
Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,155 kg 2,546 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 783 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























