Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best estimated range735 km457 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,442kg3,179lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,902kg4,193lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 22.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 735km457mi Calculated | 657km408mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 3,874mm153in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5,200-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 22.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.6 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 6.3 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has more power, Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 735 km 457 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 657 km 408 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 735 km 457 mi | 657 km 408 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI | Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Has 379 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Is 237 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























