Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsHyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai i30 III
N 2.0 T-GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,442 kg3,179 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,442kg3,179lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 1,902kg4,193lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 23.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 735km457mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,335mm171in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,451mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 395L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 1,301L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 23.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 250 hp 186 kW |
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI has 5 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.6 s |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | Hyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 735 km 457 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Hyundai i30 III N 2.0 T-GDI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























