Skoda Octavia III
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best economy score91/100
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 1,912kg4,215lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 22.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 772km480mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 3,874mm153in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,449mm57in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5,200-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 22.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 has 1 hp more than Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI and Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 772 km 480 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.1 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 772 km 480 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI | Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 379 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























