Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F65)

Cooper S 2.0

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2024-present
VS

Mini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018

Cooper SD 2.0

170 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    275 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0

  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,240 kg
    2,734 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,048 km
    651 mi
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Power
204hp152kW
170hp127kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,355kg2,987lb
1,240kg2,734lb
Gross weight
1,865kg4,112lb
1,700kg3,748lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
79.3s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
76.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
32.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
647km402mi
Calculated
1,048km651mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,036mm159in
3,850mm152in
Width
1,744mm69in
1,727mm68in
Height
1,464mm58in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,495mm98in
Front track-
1,485mm58in
Rear track-
1,485mm58in
Ground clearance-
143mm6in
Trunk volume
275L
211L
Max trunk volume
925L
731L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
44L
44L
CO2 emissions-
111g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,500 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
32.7 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 has 34 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 34 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
1,355 kg
2,987 lb
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1,240 kg
2,734 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
242 km/h
150 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
647 km
402 mi
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1,048 km
651 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
204 hp
152 kW
6.8 s
242 km/h
150 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
7.2 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,036 mm
158.9 in
Height
1,464 mm
57.6 in
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.8 s
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Power
204 hp
152 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,355 kg
2,987 lb
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,036 mm
158.9 in
Height
1,464 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
647 km
402 mi
1,048 km
651 mi
CO2 score
-
111 g/km
Trunk score
275 L
9.7 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km7.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi11.83 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal630 L166 US gal139 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,103 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 34 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 64 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 401 km (249 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 vs Mini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster