Mini Hatch (R56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6vsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,130 kg2,491 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,130kg2,491lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 704km438mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,714mm146in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,407mm55in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,467mm97in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 941L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 has 19 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 6.5 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 704 km 438 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 704 km 438 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6 | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (R56) JCW 1.6
- Has 19 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 118 L more trunk volume
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























