Mini Hatch (F56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,160 kg2,557 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,160kg2,557lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km471mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,850mm152in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 941L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 759 km 471 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 471 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























