Renault Megane III CC
Car comparison
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCevsMini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Coupe (R58)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range781 km485 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,926kg4,246lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 108.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 80.4s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.5s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,384mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,609mm103in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 417L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 188g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.5 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 has 4 hp more than Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 741 km 460 mi |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 188 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe | Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 350 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 41 km (25 mi) more estimated range
- Has 69 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























