Car comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6vsMini Countryman (U25) C 1.5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)

1.6

150 hp1598 ccHybridFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2023
VS

Mini Countryman (U25)

C 1.5

156 hp1499 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6

  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.6 L/100 km
    147.0 mpg US
    176.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    2,688 km
    1,670 mi
  • Largest trunk
    591 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Most powerful
    156 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,545 kg
    3,406 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    101 hp/t
    75 kW/t
    9.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Power
150hp112kW
156hp116kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,763kg3,887lb
1,545kg3,406lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
2,095kg4,619lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
97.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
87.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
50.3s
Calculated
49.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.6L/100 km147mpg US176.6mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
85hp/t63kW/t39hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
2,688km1,670mi
Calculated
871km541mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,499cc91cu in
Length
4,447mm175in
4,444mm175in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,843mm73in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,661mm65in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,692mm106in
Front track
1,601mm63in
-
Rear track
1,610mm63in
-
Ground clearance
219mm9in
-
Trunk volume
591L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,670L
1,450L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
43L
54L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5PowerTorque
  • Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.66,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.54,700-6,500 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.3 s
49.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
150 hp
112 kW
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
156 hp
116 kW

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 has 6 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
1,763 kg
3,887 lb
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1,545 kg
3,406 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
215 km/h
134 mph
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.68.8 s
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.58.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 4.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
85 hp/t
63 kW/t
11.8 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
2,688 km
1,670 mi
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
871 km
541 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
156 hp
116 kW
8.3 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
591 L
20.9 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
8.8 s
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
85 hp/t
63 kW/t
11.8 kg/hp
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
Power
150 hp
112 kW
156 hp
116 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,763 kg
3,887 lb
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
Fuel consumption
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
591 L
20.9 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Range score
2,688 km
1,670 mi
871 km
541 mi
Trunk score
591 L
20.9 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
85 hp/t
63 kW/t
11.8 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
Consumption1.6 L/100 km147 mpg US176.6 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.80 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.51 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used240 L63 US gal53 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost420.00 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1,817 km (1,129 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 141 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 218 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6
1.2
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
C 1.5
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
1.6
1.2 PureTech
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
C 1.5
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.6
GLA 200d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d
C 1.5
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.6
1.5 eTSI
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI
C 1.5
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.6
2.0 TDI EVO
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsCupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO
1.6
C 1.5
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
C 1.5
1.5 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5vsSeatAronaFacelift 20211.5 TSI
1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6vsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 vs Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster