Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6vsCupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor
2.0 TDI EVO
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.6 L/100 km147.0 mpg US176.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,688 km1,670 mi
- Largest trunk591 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,548 kg3,413 lb
- Best power-to-weight97 hp/t72 kW/t10.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,763kg3,887lb | 1,548kg3,413lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.3s Calculated | 72.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1.6L/100 km147mpg US176.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 85hp/t63kW/t39hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,688km1,670mi Calculated | 962km597mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,450mm175in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,528mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 219mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 591L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,670L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.3 s | 72.7 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 1,548 kg 3,413 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 8.8 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 85 hp/t 63 kW/t 11.8 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 2,688 km 1,670 mi |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 962 km 597 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 |
| 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | 85 hp/t 63 kW/t 11.8 kg/hp | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 | CupraFormentor2.0 TDI EVO | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb | 1,548 kg 3,413 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.6 L/100 km 147.0 mpg US 176.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,688 km 1,670 mi | 962 km 597 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 591 L 20.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 85 hp/t 63 kW/t 11.8 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1.6 L/100 km147 mpg US176.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 2.80 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 4.51 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 240 L63 US gal53 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 420.00 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,726 km (1,072 mi) more estimated range
- Has 171 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TDI EVO
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























