Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Seat Tarraco

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,109 km
    689 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,733kg3,821lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,520kg5,556lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
83.1s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
38.3s
Calculated
49.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,109km689mi
Calculated
822km511mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,735mm186in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,790mm110in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,574mm62in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
192mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
230L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
122g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.3 s
49.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1,733 kg
3,821 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
220 km/h
137 mph
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
211 km/h
131 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.9 s
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,109 km
689 mi
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
822 km
511 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
220 km/h
137 mph
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
8.0 s
211 km/h
131 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.9 s
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0SeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,733 kg
3,821 lb
Fuel consumption
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
1,109 km
689 mi
822 km
511 mi
CO2 score
122 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.05 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.96 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used690 L182 US gal152 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,208 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 223 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 287 km (178 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 220 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI EVO
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsSeatArona1.5 TSI EVO
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsSeatAronaFacelift 20211.5 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
40 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Cooper SD 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster