Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsMini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (U25)
C 1.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score94/100
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 87.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 49.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,109km689mi Calculated | 871km541mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,444mm175in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,450L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 49.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 34 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.9 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,109 km 689 mi |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 871 km 541 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,109 km 689 mi | 871 km 541 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 | Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 238 km (148 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























