Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5vsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper D 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,020 km634 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 83.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.8s Calculated | 64.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 871km541mi Calculated | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.8 s | 64.8 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 has 6 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 8.3 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 and Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 871 km 541 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,020 km 634 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 871 km 541 mi | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 149 km (93 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























