Mini Convertible (F67)
Car comparison
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (R57)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,255 kg2,767 lb
- Best estimated range758 km471 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,255kg2,767lb |
| Gross weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 758km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,879mm153in | 3,714mm146in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,499mm59in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | 215L | 660L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.3 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 175 hp 130 kW |
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 has 29 hp more than Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.9 s |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 758 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 175 hp 130 kW | 7.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (R57)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 758 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (R57) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 91 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























