Mini Convertible (F67)
Car comparison
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (R57)
JCW 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,265 kg2,789 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range685 km426 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,265kg2,789lb |
| Gross weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 685km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,879mm153in | 3,758mm148in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,499mm59in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | 215L | 660L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.3 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6 has 7 hp more than Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.9 s |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 7.1 s |
Although Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6 has more power, Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 685 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (R57)JCW 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 685 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (R57) JCW 1.6
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























