Car comparison

Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6vsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Clubman (R55)

JCW 1.6

211 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2010-2014
VS

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    175 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,205kg2,657lb
1,515kg3,340lb
Gross weight
1,690kg3,726lb
2,075kg4,575lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
61.5s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
29.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t131kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
694km432mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
3,958mm156in
4,666mm184in
Width
1,683mm66in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,432mm56in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,547mm100in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,453mm57in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,461mm58in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
-
Trunk volume
260L
422L
Max trunk volume
930L
1,354L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
70L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.66,000 rpm2,000-5,300 rpm6,250 rpm
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
29.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
211 hp
157 kW
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,515 kg
3,340 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
238 km/h
148 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.66.8 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
694 km
432 mi
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
211 hp
157 kW
6.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
3,958 mm
155.8 in
Height
1,432 mm
56.4 in
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.8 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
3,958 mm
155.8 in
Height
1,432 mm
56.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
694 km
432 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
179 g/km
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 310 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 215 km (133 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 162 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

JCW 1.6
JCW 2.0
VS
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6vsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6vsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
2.0 T5
VS
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
JCW 1.6
2.5 T5
VS
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
JCW 1.6
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 vs Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster