Mini Clubman (R55)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6vsSkoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Scout
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,230kg2,712lb | 1,484kg3,272lb |
| Gross weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 2,129kg4,694lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.9s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 3,961mm156in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,432mm56in | 1,531mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,547mm100in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 171mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 150g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.9 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.7 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 150 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 | Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 254 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 297 km (185 mi) more estimated range
- Has 350 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























