Seat Leon X-Perience
Car comparison
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSIvsSkoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Scout
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,484 kg3,272 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,484kg3,272lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,129kg4,694lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.7s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 846km526mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,543mm179in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,481mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,503mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 171mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 150g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.7 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI has more power, Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | SkodaOctavia III Scout2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,484 kg 3,272 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 846 km 526 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 150 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI | Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Scout 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 2 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























