Seat Leon III ST
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSIvsMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (R55)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range877 km545 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,297kg2,859lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,715kg3,781lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 65.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.7s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 3,958mm156in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,432mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,547mm100in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,511mm59in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,470L | 930L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.7 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 has 4 hp more than Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 7.7 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.7 s |
Although Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 877 km 545 mi |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST 1.8 TSI
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 327 L more trunk volume
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























