Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0dvsMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (R55)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,043 km648 mi
- Largest trunk360 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,715kg3,781lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 65.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,043km648mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 3,958mm156in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,432mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,547mm100in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | 930L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 6 hp more than Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,043 km 648 mi |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,043 km 648 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 262 km (163 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























