Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0vsVolvo V90 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions148 g/km
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,996kg4,400lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | - |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,553mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 D5 has 4 hp more than Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 and Volvo V90 2.0 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 6.3 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 D5 has more power, Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 and Volvo V90 2.0 D5: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D5 and Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 649 km 403 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D5 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | VolvoV902.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,996 kg 4,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 | Volvo V90 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
- Is 521 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V90 2.0 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 423 km (263 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























