Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2019-2021
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,450 kg
    3,197 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,067 km
    663 mi
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,681kg3,706lb
1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight
2,146kg4,731lb
2,025kg4,464lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
77.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
31.5s
Calculated
31.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,065km661mi
Calculated
1,067km663mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,447mm57in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
660L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
48L
CO2 emissions-
119g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.5 s
31.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,681 kg
3,706 lb
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,450 kg
3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.07.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,065 km
661 mi
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,067 km
663 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,681 kg
3,706 lb
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,065 km
661 mi
1,067 km
663 mi
CO2 score
-
119 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 231 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
320d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
Cooper SD 2.0
520d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
CLA 220d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220d
Cooper SD 2.0
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
C 220d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)40 TDI
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI vs Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster