Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsBMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Touring (G21)
320d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,681kg3,706lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,146kg4,731lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 69.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 29.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km661mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,709mm185in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,827mm72in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,851mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 125g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 29.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,681 kg 3,706 lb |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,065 km 661 mi |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,681 kg 3,706 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 661 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 125 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 231 km (144 mi) more estimated range
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 116 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























