Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

Most powerful
190 hp
142 kW
Highest torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Best power-to-weight
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,067 km
663 mi
Best performance score
51/100
Best economy score
95/100

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.5 s
Fastest top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightest
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
Largest trunk
610 L
Best overall score
62/100
Best practicality score
88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power	180hp134kW	190hp142kW
Torque	280Nm207lb-ft	360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight	1,375kg3,031lb	1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight	2,013kg4,438lb	2,025kg4,464lb
Top speed	227 km/h 141 mph	225 km/h 140 mph
To 99% top speed	69.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated	71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.5s	7.6s
0-200 km/h	30.3s Calculated	31.9s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.1s Calculated	7.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK	4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK	5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK	4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.4s Calculated	15.5s Calculated
Power-to-weight	131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated	131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated	248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	833km518mi Calculated	1,067km663mi Calculated
Displacement	1,798cc110cu in	1,995cc122cu in
Length	4,667mm184in	4,253mm167in
Width	1,814mm71in	1,800mm71in
Height	1,463mm58in	1,441mm57in
Wheelbase	2,680mm106in	2,670mm105in
Front track	1,543mm61in	1,559mm61in
Rear track	1,542mm61in	1,561mm61in
Ground clearance	139mm5in	141mm6in
Trunk volume	610L	360L
Max trunk volume	1,740L	1,250L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	55L	48L
CO2 emissions	-	119g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	4,500-6,200 rpm	1,350-4,500 rpm	6,450 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	4,000 rpm	1,500-2,750 rpm	4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.1 s	7.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.5 s	7.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	30.3 s	31.9 s
Top speed	227 km/h 141 mph	225 km/h 140 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.7 s
330 ft 101 m	6.9 s	6.9 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.2 s	10.2 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.0 s	13.1 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.4 s	15.5 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	154 km/h 96 mph	152 km/h 95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	180 hp 134 kW
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	190 hp 142 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	280 Nm 207 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	360 Nm 266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	1,375 kg 3,031 lb
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	1,450 kg 3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	227 km/h 141 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	225 km/h 140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	7.5 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	7.6 s

Although Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	833 km 518 mi
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	1,067 km 663 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	180 hp 134 kW	7.5 s	227 km/h 141 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	190 hp 142 kW	7.6 s	225 km/h 140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	7.5 s
Top speed 227 km/h 141 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	610 L 21.5 cu ft
Length	4,667 mm 183.7 in
Height	1,463 mm 57.6 in

MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0

Power	190 hp 142 kW
0-100 km/h	7.6 s
Top speed 225 km/h 140 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	360 L 12.7 cu ft
Length	4,253 mm 167.4 in
Height	1,441 mm 56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	7.5 s
Top speed 227 km/h 141 mph

6.6 L/100 km

35.6 mpg US

42.8 mpg UK

MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0

Power	190 hp 142 kW
0-100 km/h	7.6 s
Top speed 225 km/h 140 mph

4.5 L/100 km

52.3 mpg US

62.8 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK	7.5 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK	7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp	6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp	4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI

MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0

Power

180 hp

134 kW

190 hp

142 kW

Torque

280 Nm

207 lb-ft

360 Nm

266 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.5 s

7.6 s

Top speed

227 km/h

141 mph

225 km/h

140 mph

Lightness

1,375 kg

3,031 lb

1,450 kg

3,197 lb

Fuel consumption

6.6 L/100 km

35.6 mpg US

42.8 mpg UK

4.5 L/100 km

52.3 mpg US

62.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	610 L 21.5 cu ft
Length	4,667 mm 183.7 in
Height	1,463 mm 57.6 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	360 L 12.7 cu ft
Length	4,253 mm 167.4 in
Height	1,441 mm 56.7 in

Range score

833 km

518 mi

1,067 km

663 mi

CO2 score

119 g/km

Trunk score

610 L

21.5 cu ft

360 L

12.7 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

131 hp/t

98 kW/t

7.6 kg/hp

131 hp/t

98 kW/t

7.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI	Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption	6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK	4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	11.55 LC100 km	7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	18.59 LC100 mi	12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	990 L262 US gal218 UK gal	675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,733 LC/year	1,181 LC/year