Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0vsVolvo V90 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions127 g/km
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,906kg4,202lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,906 kg 4,202 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoV902.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,906 kg 4,202 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 396 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























