Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0vsSkoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Scout · Facelift 2017
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,019 km633 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,668kg3,677lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,178kg4,802lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 40.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,019km633mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,687mm185in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,531mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 171mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 40.2 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 1,668 kg 3,677 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 1,019 km 633 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaOctavia III ScoutFacelift 20172.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,668 kg 3,677 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,019 km 633 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 | Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 158 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Scout Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























