Car comparison

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0vsSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019
VS

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

RS 2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,637kg3,609lb
Gross weight
2,085kg4,597lb
2,097kg4,623lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
1,038km645mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,253mm167in
4,689mm185in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,814mm71in
Height
1,441mm57in
1,452mm57in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,561mm61in
1,544mm61in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
360L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,250L
1,740L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
55L
CO2 emissions
127g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
36.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
1,637 kg
3,609 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
222 km/h
138 mph
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.07.4 s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,000 km
621 mi
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
1,038 km
645 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
222 km/h
138 mph
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
7.7 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.4 s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,637 kg
3,609 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
1,038 km
645 mi
CO2 score
127 g/km
-
Trunk score
360 L
12.7 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 127 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 38 km (23 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
RS 2.0 TDI
520i
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20172.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
320d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
RS 2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
CLA 220
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0vsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIvsVolvoV902.0 D4
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster