Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range828 km514 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 2,058kg4,537lb | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 758km471mi Calculated | 828km514mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,667mm184in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,463mm58in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.2 s |
Although Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 758 km 471 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 828 km 514 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.2 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 758 km 471 mi | 828 km 514 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























