Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,309 kg2,886 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range828 km514 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,309kg2,886lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 828km514mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,470L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,309 kg 2,886 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 828 km 514 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.2 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,309 kg 2,886 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 828 km 514 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 86 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























