Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,385 kg
    3,053 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    122 g/km
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Best estimated range
    1,065 km
    661 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,435kg3,164lb
1,385kg3,053lb
Gross weight
2,085kg4,597lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
78.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
68.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
30.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,065km661mi
Calculated
1,043km648mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,856mm191in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
149mm6in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
660L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
48L
CO2 emissions
140g/km
122g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI4,000-6,200 rpm1,450-3,900 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
30.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
1,435 kg
3,164 lb
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,385 kg
3,053 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI8.1 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
1,065 km
661 mi
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,043 km
648 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
8.1 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.1 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,435 kg
3,164 lb
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,065 km
661 mi
1,043 km
648 mi
CO2 score
140 g/km
122 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km8.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi12.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal690 L182 US gal152 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,208 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 300 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 50 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)1.8 TSI
2.0d
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20171.8 TSI
2.0d
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
2.0d
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
1.8 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI vs Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster