Car comparison

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0dvsSkoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Skoda Octavia III Scout

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    117 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,091 km
    678 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniClubman (F54)2.0dSkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,447kg3,190lb
Gross weight
1,980kg4,365lb
2,092kg4,612lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
30.8s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,091km678mi
Calculated
797km495mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,798cc110cu in
Length
4,253mm167in
4,685mm184in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,814mm71in
Height
1,441mm57in
1,531mm60in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,679mm105in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,538mm61in
Rear track
1,561mm61in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
171mm7in
Trunk volume
360L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,250L
1,740L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
55L
CO2 emissions
117g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0dSkoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniClubman (F54)2.0dSkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.8 s
37.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
1,447 kg
3,190 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
225 km/h
140 mph
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d7.4 s
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,091 km
678 mi
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
797 km
495 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.8 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,531 mm
60.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
7.4 s
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniClubman (F54)2.0dSkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,447 kg
3,190 lb
Fuel consumption
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,531 mm
60.3 in
Range score
1,091 km
678 mi
797 km
495 mi
CO2 score
117 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
360 L
12.7 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Clubman (F54) 2.0dSkoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI
Consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.70 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.39 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used660 L174 US gal145 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,155 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 42 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 294 km (183 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 41 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI

  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.0d
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
2.0d
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Scout1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d vs Skoda Octavia III Scout 1.8 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster