Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions120 g/km
- Best estimated range1,435 km892 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,581kg3,486lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,435km892mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,767mm188in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 120g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 5,000 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,581 kg 3,486 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 and Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,435 km 892 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,581 kg 3,486 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,435 km 892 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 120 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 621 km (386 mi) more estimated range
- Has 290 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 191 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























