Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0vsSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions121 g/km
- Best estimated range1,087 km675 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 30.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 814km506mi Calculated | 1,087km675mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,508mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 121g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 5,000 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 30.8 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 has 8 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 7.1 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 814 km 506 mi |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,087 km 675 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)2.0 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 814 km 506 mi | 1,087 km 675 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 121 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 273 km (170 mi) more estimated range
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























