Car comparison

Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTECvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Opel Astra K Sports Tourer

1.6 ECOTEC

200 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,318 kg
    2,906 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    814 km
    506 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelOpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECMiniClubman (F54)2.0
Power
200hp149kW
192hp143kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,318kg2,906lb
1,390kg3,064lb
Gross weight
1,960kg4,321lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
72.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
67.5s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
28.4s
Calculated
28.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
774km481mi
Calculated
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,702mm185in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,809mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,499mm59in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,662mm105in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,548mm61in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance-
141mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,630L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
48L
CO2 emissions
142g/km
137g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTECMini Clubman (F54) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC4,700-5,500 rpm1,700-4,700 rpm5,750 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)2.05,000 rpm1,250 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricOpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECMiniClubman (F54)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.4 s
28.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
200 hp
149 kW
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC has 8 hp more than Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 and Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
1,390 kg
3,064 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
235 km/h
146 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.07.1 s

Although Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC has more power, Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 and Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
774 km
481 mi
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
814 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
200 hp
149 kW
7.7 s
235 km/h
146 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.1 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTEC
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleOpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECMiniClubman (F54)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,702 mm
185.1 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
774 km
481 mi
814 km
506 mi
CO2 score
142 g/km
137 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleOpel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTECMini Clubman (F54) 2.0
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 72 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 180 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0

  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 ECOTEC
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
1.6 ECOTEC
2.0
VS
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECvsMiniClubman (F54)2.0
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
1.6 ECOTEC
CLS 250 BlueTEC
VS
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECvsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 250 BlueTEC
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
1.6 ECOTEC
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
1.6 ECOTEC
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
OpelAstra K Sports Tourer1.6 ECOTECvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0
520d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 ECOTEC vs Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster