Skoda Kodiaq II
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSIvsMini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Aceman (J05)
JCW 54.2 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk340 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 56.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,761mm187in | 4,079mm161in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,754mm69in |
| Height | 1,663mm65in | 1,514mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,606mm103in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,519mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 340L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,035L | 1,005L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 5,000 rpm | 50-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 258 hp 192 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh and Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 s |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























