Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4vsSkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale

2.0 T4

272 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2025

Skoda Kodiaq II

RS 2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

Fastest top speed
235 km/h
146 mph Unrestricted
225 km/h
140 mph Restricted
Most powerful
272 hp
203 kW
Highest torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Lightest
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Best power-to-weight
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Largest trunk
500 L
Best overall score
67/100
Best performance score
59/100
Best practicality score
84/100

Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.4 s
Lowest combined fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Best estimated range
674 km
419 mi
Best economy score
84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power	272hp203kW	265hp198kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight	1,600kg3,527lb	1,935kg4,266lb
Gross weight	2,250kg4,960lb	2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated	231 km/h 144 mph
To 99% top speed	69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated	72.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.5s	6.4s
0-200 km/h	25.9s Calculated	27.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.2s Calculated	6.1s Calculated
Fuel consumption	9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK	8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	14.6s Calculated	14.5s Calculated
Power-to-weight	170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated	137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated	207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	520km323mi Calculated	674km419mi Calculated
Displacement	1,995cc122cu in	1,984cc121cu in
Length	4,527mm178in	4,761mm187in
Width	1,841mm72in	1,864mm73in
Height	1,657mm65in	1,663mm65in
Wheelbase	2,635mm104in	2,791mm110in
Front track	1,574mm62in	1,580mm62in
Rear track	1,573mm62in	1,570mm62in
Ground clearance	212mm8in	194mm8in
Trunk volume	500L	340L
Max trunk volume	1,550L	2,035L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	7
Fuel tank	51L	58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSIPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	5,200 rpm	3,000 rpm	5,450 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	5,000-6,500 rpm	1,650-4,350 rpm	6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.2 s	6.1 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.5 s	6.4 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	25.9 s	27.8 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited	231 km/h 144 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.4 s	6.3 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.6 s	9.5 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.3 s	12.2 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.6 s	14.5 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	160 km/h 99 mph	158 km/h 98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	272 hp 203 kW
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	265 hp 198 kW

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has 7 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	400 Nm 295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	1,600 kg 3,527 lb
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	1,935 kg 4,266 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	231 km/h 144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	6.5 s
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	6.4 s

Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has more power, Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	520 km 323 mi
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	674 km 419 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	272 hp 203 kW	6.5 s	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	265 hp 198 kW	6.4 s	231 km/h 144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4

Power	272 hp 203 kW
0-100 km/h	6.5 s
Top speed Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	500 L 17.7 cu ft
Length	4,527 mm 178.2 in
Height	1,657 mm 65.2 in

SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI

Power	265 hp 198 kW
0-100 km/h	6.4 s
Top speed 231 km/h 144 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	340 L 12.0 cu ft
Length	4,761 mm 187.4 in
Height	1,663 mm 65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4

Power	272 hp 203 kW
0-100 km/h	6.5 s
Top speed Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph

9.8 L/100 km

24.0 mpg US

28.8 mpg UK

SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI

Power	265 hp 198 kW
0-100 km/h	6.4 s
Top speed 231 km/h 144 mph

8.6 L/100 km

27.4 mpg US

32.8 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK	6.5 s
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK	6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4	170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp	9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI	137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp	8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4

SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI

Power

272 hp

203 kW

265 hp

198 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.5 s

6.4 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

235 km/h146 mph

Restricted

225 km/h140 mph

231 km/h

144 mph

Lightness

1,600 kg

3,527 lb

1,935 kg

4,266 lb

Fuel consumption

9.8 L/100 km

24.0 mpg US

28.8 mpg UK

8.6 L/100 km

27.4 mpg US

32.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	500 L 17.7 cu ft
Length	4,527 mm 178.2 in
Height	1,657 mm 65.2 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	340 L 12.0 cu ft
Length	4,761 mm 187.4 in
Height	1,663 mm 65.5 in

Range score

520 km

323 mi

674 km

419 mi

Trunk score

500 L

17.7 cu ft

340 L

12.0 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

170 hp/t

127 kW/t

5.9 kg/hp

137 hp/t

102 kW/t

7.3 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4	Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
Consumption	9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK	8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	17.15 LC100 km	15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	27.60 LC100 mi	24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal	1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,573 LC/year	2,258 LC/year