Skoda Kodiaq II
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 III (GU)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful268 hp200 kW
- Lightest1,925 kg4,244 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Largest trunk782 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 268hp200kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | - |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 691km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,761mm187in | 4,717mm186in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,663mm65in | 1,669mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,817mm111in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 340L | 782L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,035L | 1,611L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 3 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 674 km 419 mi |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 691 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 268 hp 200 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 691 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | 782 L 27.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 442 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























