Volvo V70 II
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20vsMG ZT-T 4.6 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMG ZT-T
4.6 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Best power-to-weight180 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score83/100
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best economy score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 500km311mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 4,601cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,790mm189in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,610mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 400L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,220L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 314g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20: Power / Torque
- MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 5,200 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 5,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20 has 40 hp more than MG ZT-T 4.6 V8.
The biggest power difference is between MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 and Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 5.9 s |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGZT-T4.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | MGZT-T4.6 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 500 km 311 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 314 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20
- Has 40 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























