Volvo V70 II
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20vsAUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 40V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001
4.2 V8 40V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight180 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score83/100
AUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 40V
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 19.4L/100 km12.1mpg US14.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 626km389mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 4,172cc255cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,833mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,759mm109in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,590L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 314g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 5,200 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 5.9 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20 and AUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 40V: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | AUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 626 km 389 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 314 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
AUDI A6 Avant (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 40V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























