MG ZT
Car comparison
MG ZT 4.6 V8vsVolvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60
2.3 T5 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
MG ZT 4.6 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Largest trunk432 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | MGZT4.6 V8 | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,537kg3,389lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.4s Calculated | 21.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 492km306mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 2,319cc142cu in |
| Length | 4,740mm187in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,428mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 432L | 424L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,034L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 314g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- MG ZT 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 5,200 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MGZT4.6 V8 | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.4 s | 21.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW |
MG ZT 4.6 V8 has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V and MG ZT 4.6 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 6.5 s |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT 4.6 V8 and Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGZT4.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MGZT4.6 V8 | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 492 km 306 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 314 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | MG ZT 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
MG ZT 4.6 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Is 143 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























