Car comparison

MG ZT 4.6 V8vsAUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

MG ZT

4.6 V8

260 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2005
VS

AUDI A6 (4F/C6)

3.2 FSI V6

255 hp3123 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2004-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.5 L/100 km
    14.3 mpg US
    17.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    262 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    734 km
    456 mi
  • Largest trunk
    546 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

MG ZT 4.6 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    410 Nm
    302 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMGZT4.6 V8AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
260hp194kW
255hp190kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Gross weight-
2,220kg4,894lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
70.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
20.4s
Calculated
21.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
155hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
492km306mi
Calculated
734km456mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
3,123cc191cu in
Length
4,740mm187in
4,916mm194in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,855mm73in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,459mm57in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,843mm112in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,612mm63in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,618mm64in
Trunk volume
432L
-
Max trunk volume-
546L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
80L
CO2 emissions
314g/km
262g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

MG ZT 4.6 V8AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • MG ZT 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MGZT4.6 V85,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V66,500 rpm3,250 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMGZT4.6 V8AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.4 s
21.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
255 hp
190 kW

MG ZT 4.6 V8 has 5 hp more than AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and MG ZT 4.6 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V86.5 s
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V66.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT 4.6 V8 and AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 and MG ZT 4.6 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT4.6 V8
492 km
306 mi
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
734 km
456 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MGZT4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
255 hp
190 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MGZT4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,740 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
546 L
19.3 cu ft
Length
4,916 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,459 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MGZT4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MGZT4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.5 s
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MGZT4.6 V8
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMGZT4.6 V8AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
255 hp
190 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,740 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
546 L
19.3 cu ft
Length
4,916 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,459 mm
57.4 in
Range score
492 km
306 mi
734 km
456 mi
CO2 score
314 g/km
262 g/km
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
546 L
19.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMG ZT 4.6 V8AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

MG ZT 4.6 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6

  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 242 km (150 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 114 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 52 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
MG ZT 4.6 V8
AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 V8
2.0
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
3.2 FSI V6
2.7 V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
4.6 V8
430 V8
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
3.2 FSI V6
2.7 T V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6
4.6 V8
2.9 T6 24V
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
3.2 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
4.6 V8
330i
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330i
3.2 FSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
3.2 FSI V6
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI
4.6 V8
2.3 T5 20V
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsVolvoS602.3 T5 20V
3.2 FSI V6
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
4.6 V8
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MGZT4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
MG ZT 4.6 V8 vs AUDI A6 (4F/C6) 3.2 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster